If you are presently enraged because Pres. George W. Bush and Senator John McCain are using the ‘appeasement’ label to describe the Democratic Party’s usual method of world diplomacy, you might be a commie pinko.
See How to Enrage a Democrat - WSJ.com for a clear description of why pinko’s are enraged.
This is understandable; to quote some ancient scripture, ‘the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.’ (Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 16:2)
As Sean Hannity points out in his book, “Delivery Us From Evil, Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism,” appeasement under the guise of diplomacy has been the main focus of the last two democratic presidents.
“When President Bush drew his line in the sand, the voices of evil abroad, and appeasement at home, erupted as one in mockery and protest (just like Obama, HIllary, snake-oil Pelosi and other pinkos in the news today)….And regardless of which candidate stands for the Democratic Party in November, America must realize that the candidate who opposes George Bush (insert John McCain) will be the candidate of appeasement. He will be standing for the party of Jimmy Carter, of Bill Clinton, for the party of moral relativism, or toleration, and hesitation in the face of threats at home and abroad.”
Hannity wrote that in 2004, however, it appears to be even more applicable to today’s raft of commie pinko leftist liberals who will surely place our county and live in jeopardy. Either Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton is a Neville Chamberlain waiting to happen.
