You Might Be a Commie Pinko

If you think the current strategy that the Democrats promise, an immediate pull-out from Iraq after their ticket is elected, will keep the US safe from Islamic Jihadist terrorists, you might be a commie pinko.

Think about this: if you take a target (US troops) in Iraq that is currently under fire and move it back to the US, will the terrorists just give up? Hardly, they will go after the target they really want, US citizens on US soil. Either Clinton, Obama, or any other Nancy Pelosi/Howard Dean puppet, if elected, will bring the war on terror right to our shores!

If you think Clinton/Gore did everything they could to confront the war on terror while in office, keeping us from harm’s way and postponing the 9/11 attacks, you might be commie pinko.

On the contrary, Clinton’s policy of appeasement and working thought the UN, with an occasional cruise missile, actually emboldened Islamic Jihadists world wide and contributed to the 9/11 attacks.

“Clinton didn’t embrace the issue of terrorism; he ran from it. And we’re still paying the price. As Fox News contributor Rich Lowry summarized in Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years, ‘The September 11 attacks finally gave Clinton the legacy he had yearned for; one that couldn’t be ignored, one that was great it is implications. His could no longer be considered an inconsequential presidency. In leaving the country vulnerable to such an attack after eight years in office, Clinton had achieved the distinction of a monstrous, world-shaking failure.’” (Deliver Us From Evil, Sean Hannity, Regan Books, 2004, p. 129)