You Might Be a Commie Pinko

If you are presently enraged because Pres. George W. Bush and Senator John McCain are using the ‘appeasement’ label to describe the Democratic Party’s usual method of world diplomacy, you might be a commie pinko.

See How to Enrage a Democrat - WSJ.com for a clear description of why pinko’s are enraged.

This is understandable; to quote some ancient scripture, ‘the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.’ (Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 16:2)

As Sean Hannity points out in his book, “Delivery Us From Evil, Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism,” appeasement under the guise of diplomacy has been the main focus of the last two democratic presidents.

“When President Bush drew his line in the sand, the voices of evil abroad, and appeasement at home, erupted as one in mockery and protest (just like Obama, HIllary, snake-oil Pelosi and other pinkos in the news today)….And regardless of which candidate stands for the Democratic Party in November, America must realize that the candidate who opposes George Bush (insert John McCain) will be the candidate of appeasement. He will be standing for the party of Jimmy Carter, of Bill Clinton, for the party of moral relativism, or toleration, and hesitation in the face of threats at home and abroad.”

Hannity wrote that in 2004, however, it appears to be even more applicable to today’s raft of commie pinko leftist liberals who will surely place our county and live in jeopardy. Either Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton is a Neville Chamberlain waiting to happen.

If you think Hillary’s statement about ‘white americans’ (see below) is racist, you might be a commie pinko.

“”You know, there was just an AP article posted that found how Senator Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans is weakening again and how the whites in both states (Indiana and North Carolina) who had not completed college were supporting me and in independents, I was running even with him and doing even better with Democratic-leaning independents. I have a much broader base to build a winning coaltion on.”

This statement by Hillary was jumped on by most Commie Pinko pundits as a clear signal that Senator Clinton had played the race card, when she was merely stating fact.

Pinkos spend much time and effort pandering to their special interest groups; blacks, Latinos, gays, students, environmentalists; in short, anyone with a cause. They immediately respond to any characterization or description of their groups as racism, profiling, or discrimination, even before they really think about what was said.   Quoting Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post; “Clinton implies but doesn’t quite come out and say … that Obama is black — and that white people who are not wealthy are irredeemably racist.”

Point proven. Quote a fact about a special interest group, get attacked.  Commie Pinkos UNITE!

Hmmmm… where were the Pinkos when Huckabee made religious slurs about Mormons. Oh, wait, they are not part of a Pinko special interest group.

If you think the current strategy that the Democrats promise, an immediate pull-out from Iraq after their ticket is elected, will keep the US safe from Islamic Jihadist terrorists, you might be a commie pinko.

Think about this: if you take a target (US troops) in Iraq that is currently under fire and move it back to the US, will the terrorists just give up? Hardly, they will go after the target they really want, US citizens on US soil. Either Clinton, Obama, or any other Nancy Pelosi/Howard Dean puppet, if elected, will bring the war on terror right to our shores!

If you think Clinton/Gore did everything they could to confront the war on terror while in office, keeping us from harm’s way and postponing the 9/11 attacks, you might be commie pinko.

On the contrary, Clinton’s policy of appeasement and working thought the UN, with an occasional cruise missile, actually emboldened Islamic Jihadists world wide and contributed to the 9/11 attacks.

“Clinton didn’t embrace the issue of terrorism; he ran from it. And we’re still paying the price. As Fox News contributor Rich Lowry summarized in Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years, ‘The September 11 attacks finally gave Clinton the legacy he had yearned for; one that couldn’t be ignored, one that was great it is implications. His could no longer be considered an inconsequential presidency. In leaving the country vulnerable to such an attack after eight years in office, Clinton had achieved the distinction of a monstrous, world-shaking failure.’” (Deliver Us From Evil, Sean Hannity, Regan Books, 2004, p. 129)

If you think gun registration efforts are about making it safer for all of us, you might be a commie pinko.

Gun registration is about ‘control’ or government wanting to take away your ability to protect yourself from other people or the government itself. Registration is just the first step.  Commie Pinkos are convinced that you are not smart enough to manage firearms; like most social programs, they know better and will do it for you. Consider these two quotes:

“We are the first nation to achieve full gun registration. Our streets  will be safer, our police will be more efficient and the world will follow our lead.  — Adolf Hilter, 1935

“Our police are hampered by the lack of full gun registration. We need to follow the lead of other civilized nations in securing our streets!” — Bill Clinton, March 2000

If you think the second amendment was put into the Bill of Rights solely to protect the government’s ability to form militias, you might be a Commie Pinko.

Actually, the second amendment is about INDIVIDUAL rights - see http://www.nranews.com/article.aspx?article=91

“Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and or all.”
(Nikita Khrushchev , February 25, 1956 20th Congress of the Communist Party)

“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.”
(Hillary Clinton, 1993)

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans …”
(President Bill Clinton, USA Today, March 11, 1993, Page 2A)

If you hang on every word spoken by the world’s foremost environmental expert (Al Gore) and firmly believe that the earth’s demise from global warming is just a few years away, you might be a Commie Pinko.

NOTE: Commie Pinkos, for an interesting read on global warming, go here: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1873/global-warming-fact-or-farce/

How many Hybrid cars must be driven to negate the green house gases from one large forest fire? Do not attempt to answer that; a true CP will not accept any data or facts unless it is from fellow CPs, Gore, or Michael Moore.

If you firmly believe that we went to war with Iraq to secure oil, or that we went to war because conservatives are warmongers who would thrust democracy as some sort of empire building strategy, that it would be better to let anti-American insurgents bring their war to our homeland, you might be a commie pinko.

UPDATE: Ann Coulter agrees with YMBACP:

“It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That’s 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK — or a landmark building, for that matter.

We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan — the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.” Bush’s America: 100 Percent Al-Qaida Free

If you sympathize with or are a member of the American Communist Lawyer’s Union (ACLU), you might be a commie pinko.

If you are a member or a sympathizer of the NEA (National Extortion Association, oops, er… National Education Association) you might be a commie pinko.