Letterman: ‘Bush’s Administration is Clearly Guilty of War Crimes?’ | NewsBusters.org

Letterman clearly pushes his anti-Bush campaign beyond the limits of ‘comedic license.’ Perhaps you are like me; I never watch the boob because of his liberal bias. He humor just gets older and older, like his audience demographic. I’d rather watch Leno witha toothache then Dave’s Commie Pinko hour.

In fact, the Army Times confirms that the email was sent, but reports that the Army is ‘correcting’ some of the email’s content. By correcting, we mean giving the mainstream media spin that Barrack can do no wrong

Officer: Part of anti-Obama e-mail was wrong - Army News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Army Times

In fact, Hussein Obama is a leftist military hater, who is only telling the world what he thinks they want to hear. Anything contrary brings a flurry of attacks from his Commie Pinko henchmen (campaign staff) and the far left media (blogs and mainstream media). What we see in the mainstream media IS FAKE (see below).

No doubt the Army was put under tremendous pressure to ’sanitize’ the email to ensure that Obama’s pro-military facade remains intact.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I trust a troop on the ground and what he may have heard and seen, rather than what he was told to correct by his superiors.

Lies, Democrats, & Liesl they are the same.

“As you know I am not a very political person. I just wanted to pass along that Senator Obama came to Bagram Afghanistan for about an hour on his visit to “The War Zone”. I wanted to share with you what happened. He got off the plane and got into a bullet proof vehicle, got to the area to meet with the Major General (2 Star) who is the commander here at Bagram.

As the Soldiers where lined up to shake his hand he blew them off and didn’t say a word as he went into the conference room to meet the General. As he finished, the vehicles took him to the ClamShell (pretty much a big top tent that military personnel can play basketball or work out in with weights) so he could take his publicity pictures playing basketball. He again shunned the opportunity to talk to Soldiers to thank them for their service.

So really he was just here to make a showing for the American’s back home that he is their candidate for President. I think that if you are going to make an effort to come all the way over here you would thank those that are providing the freedom that they are providing for you.

I swear we got more thanks from the NBA Basketball Players or the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders than from one of the Senators, who wants to be the President of the United States I just don’t understand how anyone would want him to be our Commander-and-Chief. It was almost that he was scared to be around those that provide the freedom for him and our great country.

If this is blunt and to the point I am sorry but I wanted you all to know what kind of caliber of person he really is. What you see in the news is all fake.

In service,

NAME REMOVED to protect the serviceman.

NOTE: I received the email from a relative who forwarded if from someone who knows the email author personally.

N.Y. Times rejects McCain opinion piece - Los Angeles Times

Even a liberal rag like the LA Times thinks the NY Times goes to far.  They are correct.

If you are offended by this billboard in Florida that shows an image of the falling World Trade Center’s Twin Towers alongside the words, “Please don’t vote for a Democrat;” you might be a commie pinko.

Bill Clinton’s policy of appeasement and no military action (outside several cruise missles) directly led to 9/11.  Barack Obama will do the same; he’s already announced his appeasement strategy for Iran.  A vote for a Democrat is a vote for terrorism on our soil.

In a market economy, availability directly affects price. The easier it is to get a commodity, usually the cheaper it is. The environmentalist wackos have succeeded in limiting our access to oil with their campaigns to limit offshore drilling and drilling on public lands.

“The “everywhere versus nowhere” trap results when aggressive energy developers demand the unconstrained right to drill everywhere while environmental extremists assert that drilling can occur nowhere. This is the stalemate we currently have in the United States, with disastrous consequences. Emotion trumps science. Regulation blocks innovation. And sound methods of achieving energy independence are overlooked and underdeveloped. And gas prices go up, up, up.”

Report From Norway: Why They Don’t Have an Energy Crisis and We Do
by Newt Gingrich (06/10/08)

NOTE: you can support REAL change by signing the Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less petition.

For more information read Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas.

See How to Enrage a Democrat - WSJ.com for a clear description of why pinko’s are enraged.

This is understandable; to quote some ancient scripture, ‘the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.’ (Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 16:2)

As Sean Hannity points out in his book, “Delivery Us From Evil, Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism,” appeasement under the guise of diplomacy has been the main focus of the last two democratic presidents.

“When President Bush drew his line in the sand, the voices of evil abroad, and appeasement at home, erupted as one in mockery and protest (just like Obama, HIllary, snake-oil Pelosi and other pinkos in the news today)….And regardless of which candidate stands for the Democratic Party in November, America must realize that the candidate who opposes George Bush (insert John McCain) will be the candidate of appeasement. He will be standing for the party of Jimmy Carter, of Bill Clinton, for the party of moral relativism, or toleration, and hesitation in the face of threats at home and abroad.”

Hannity wrote that in 2004, however, it appears to be even more applicable to today’s raft of commie pinko leftist liberals who will surely place our county and live in jeopardy. Either Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton is a Neville Chamberlain waiting to happen.

“”You know, there was just an AP article posted that found how Senator Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans is weakening again and how the whites in both states (Indiana and North Carolina) who had not completed college were supporting me and in independents, I was running even with him and doing even better with Democratic-leaning independents. I have a much broader base to build a winning coaltion on.”

This statement by Hillary was jumped on by most Commie Pinko pundits as a clear signal that Senator Clinton had played the race card, when she was merely stating fact.

Pinkos spend much time and effort pandering to their special interest groups; blacks, Latinos, gays, students, environmentalists; in short, anyone with a cause. They immediately respond to any characterization or description of their groups as racism, profiling, or discrimination, even before they really think about what was said.   Quoting Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post; “Clinton implies but doesn’t quite come out and say … that Obama is black — and that white people who are not wealthy are irredeemably racist.”

Point proven. Quote a fact about a special interest group, get attacked.  Commie Pinkos UNITE!

Hmmmm… where were the Pinkos when Huckabee made religious slurs about Mormons. Oh, wait, they are not part of a Pinko special interest group.

Think about this: if you take a target (US troops) in Iraq that is currently under fire and move it back to the US, will the terrorists just give up? Hardly, they will go after the target they really want, US citizens on US soil. Either Clinton, Obama, or any other Nancy Pelosi/Howard Dean puppet, if elected, will bring the war on terror right to our shores!

On the contrary, Clinton’s policy of appeasement and working thought the UN, with an occasional cruise missile, actually emboldened Islamic Jihadists world wide and contributed to the 9/11 attacks.

“Clinton didn’t embrace the issue of terrorism; he ran from it. And we’re still paying the price. As Fox News contributor Rich Lowry summarized in Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years, ‘The September 11 attacks finally gave Clinton the legacy he had yearned for; one that couldn’t be ignored, one that was great it is implications. His could no longer be considered an inconsequential presidency. In leaving the country vulnerable to such an attack after eight years in office, Clinton had achieved the distinction of a monstrous, world-shaking failure.’” (Deliver Us From Evil, Sean Hannity, Regan Books, 2004, p. 129)