You Might Be a Commie Pinko

Billboards in Florida Link Democrats to Burning World Trade Center

If you are offended by this billboard in Florida that shows an image of the falling World Trade Center’s Twin Towers alongside the words, “Please don’t vote for a Democrat;” you might be a commie pinko.

Bill Clinton’s policy of appeasement and no military action (outside several cruise missles) directly led to 9/11.  Barack Obama will do the same; he’s already announced his appeasement strategy for Iran.  A vote for a Democrat is a vote for terrorism on our soil.

If you are presently enraged because Pres. George W. Bush and Senator John McCain are using the ‘appeasement’ label to describe the Democratic Party’s usual method of world diplomacy, you might be a commie pinko.

See How to Enrage a Democrat - WSJ.com for a clear description of why pinko’s are enraged.

This is understandable; to quote some ancient scripture, ‘the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.’ (Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 16:2)

As Sean Hannity points out in his book, “Delivery Us From Evil, Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism,” appeasement under the guise of diplomacy has been the main focus of the last two democratic presidents.

“When President Bush drew his line in the sand, the voices of evil abroad, and appeasement at home, erupted as one in mockery and protest (just like Obama, HIllary, snake-oil Pelosi and other pinkos in the news today)….And regardless of which candidate stands for the Democratic Party in November, America must realize that the candidate who opposes George Bush (insert John McCain) will be the candidate of appeasement. He will be standing for the party of Jimmy Carter, of Bill Clinton, for the party of moral relativism, or toleration, and hesitation in the face of threats at home and abroad.”

Hannity wrote that in 2004, however, it appears to be even more applicable to today’s raft of commie pinko leftist liberals who will surely place our county and live in jeopardy. Either Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton is a Neville Chamberlain waiting to happen.

If you think Clinton/Gore did everything they could to confront the war on terror while in office, keeping us from harm’s way and postponing the 9/11 attacks, you might be commie pinko.

On the contrary, Clinton’s policy of appeasement and working thought the UN, with an occasional cruise missile, actually emboldened Islamic Jihadists world wide and contributed to the 9/11 attacks.

“Clinton didn’t embrace the issue of terrorism; he ran from it. And we’re still paying the price. As Fox News contributor Rich Lowry summarized in Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years, ‘The September 11 attacks finally gave Clinton the legacy he had yearned for; one that couldn’t be ignored, one that was great it is implications. His could no longer be considered an inconsequential presidency. In leaving the country vulnerable to such an attack after eight years in office, Clinton had achieved the distinction of a monstrous, world-shaking failure.’” (Deliver Us From Evil, Sean Hannity, Regan Books, 2004, p. 129)

If you think gun registration efforts are about making it safer for all of us, you might be a commie pinko.

Gun registration is about ‘control’ or government wanting to take away your ability to protect yourself from other people or the government itself. Registration is just the first step.  Commie Pinkos are convinced that you are not smart enough to manage firearms; like most social programs, they know better and will do it for you. Consider these two quotes:

“We are the first nation to achieve full gun registration. Our streets  will be safer, our police will be more efficient and the world will follow our lead.  — Adolf Hilter, 1935

“Our police are hampered by the lack of full gun registration. We need to follow the lead of other civilized nations in securing our streets!” — Bill Clinton, March 2000

If you firmly believe that we went to war with Iraq to secure oil, or that we went to war because conservatives are warmongers who would thrust democracy as some sort of empire building strategy, that it would be better to let anti-American insurgents bring their war to our homeland, you might be a commie pinko.

UPDATE: Ann Coulter agrees with YMBACP:

“It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That’s 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK — or a landmark building, for that matter.

We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan — the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.” Bush’s America: 100 Percent Al-Qaida Free

If you believe that someone other than Jimmy Carter (due to his bungling of the Shah incident) is responsible for the rouge terrorist state of Irantoday, you might be a commie pinko.

If you think Ted Kennedy got fair treatment by the press and prosecutors concerning the Chappaquiddick incident, you might be a commie pinko.

If you agree with Hillary Clinton that some vast right wing conspiracy caused her husband’s philandering, you might be a commie pinko.

PS: A true Commie Pinko would also have to lump ’sniper bullets flying overhead’ into her recollections, er, exaggerations.